The Supreme Court on Friday
said that the four accused in the Aircel-Maxis case would have to appear before
the Special Court and the scheduled the hearing on February 3, 2017.The SC said
Aircel spectrum was to be seized & transferred within 2 weeks if the
controller & owners did not appear in court in connection with the case.
Earlier yesterday, the Chennai High Court had dismissed a bunch of petitions
challenging the summons by the Enforcement Directorate citing that the
Aircel-Maxis deal was being heard by the Supreme Court. One of these petitions
had been filed by former Union Minister P Chidambaram. Karti Chidambaram
and Advantage Strategic Consultants Private Limited’s directors were among the
other known petitioners, who had challenged the ED summoning. Karti, in his
petition, had contended that the summons was a malice in law and added that the
summons was campaign was to aim to bear ill reputation of his father, P
Chidambaram. Justice B Rajendran had concurred with the Centre’s counsel and
said that the matters related to the case were being monitored by the Apex
Court.
Earlier in September, senior
advocate Harish Salve had appeared for the accused and said that the
Aircel-Maxis case was in no way related to the 2G spectrum scam. He had argued
that the Chennai-based Telecom promoter C Sivasankaran had been unduly pressured
by the then Telecom Minister Dayanidhi to sell the stake in Aircel to Ananda
Krishnan owned Maxis in 2006 but it had nothing to do with the 2G scam.
The trial court, however,
had said that the Aircel-Maxis deal fell “fairly and squarely falls within the description
of 2G scam”. The CBI had earlier alleged that Dayanidhi had “pressured” and
“forced” Sivasankaran to sell his stakes in Aircel and two subsidiary firms to
Malaysian firm Maxis Group in 2006. The Malaysian firm had favoured by
Dayanidhi and granted a licence within six months after the takeover of Aircel
in December 2006, it had said. Ex-Telecom Secretary J S Sarma was also named in
the CBI’s charge sheet. His name was put in a column of the accused against
whom trial cannot proceed.
No comments:
Post a Comment