Winding up of a company

Winding up of a company is the stage, where by the company takes its last breath. It is a process by which business of the company is wound up, and the company ceases to exist anymore. All the assets of the company are sold, and the proceedings collected are used to discharge the liabilities on a priority basis.

MODES OF WINDING UP:

There are three ways, in which a company may be wound up. They are:

A.   Winding up by the court.

B.    Voluntary winding up:

Members Voluntary winding up.

Creditors Voluntary winding up.

C.   Winding up subject to supervision of the court

A.  WINDING UP BY THE COURT:

 A company may be wound up by the court in following situations. Here, the court means "High Court".

i.    If the company itself, has passed a special resolution in the general meeting to wound up its affairs. Special resolution means, resolution passed by three-fourth (3/4") of the members present.

ii.    If there is a default, in holding the statutory meeting or in delivering the statutory report to the Registrar.

A company which is limited by shares, and a company limited by guarantee having share capital, is required to hold a " Statutory meeting" of its members, within six months, and after one month, from the date of commencement of it's business. A statutory report of the meeting so held shall also be forwarded to the registrar. [Sec 165 (1) & (5)]

iii.     If the company fails to commence its business within one year from the date of it's incorporation, or suspends its business for a whole year.

A company limited by shares, has to obtain a "certificate of commencement" of business from the registrar. Unless it obtains such certificate, it cannot carry on its business operation.

iv.     If the number of members, in a public company is reduced to less than seven, and in case of private company less than two.

The statutory requirement of minimum number of members in a public company is seven, and in case of private company, it is two (sec 12)

v.      If the company is unable to pay its debits; where the financial position of the company is, such, that it has more liabilities than assets, and after disposing off the assets, it is still unable to extinguish it's liabilities, it means that company is unable to pay it's debts.

 vi.     If the court, itself is of the opinion that the company should be wound up.

The court may form such an opinion, if it comes to the knowledge of court that, the company is mismanaged, or financially unsound, or carrying an illegal operations etc.

RELEVANT POINTS:

A. WHO CAN APPLY TO COURT, FOR WINDING UP PETITION? (SEC 439)

Following persons can apply to the court, for petition for winding up:

o        The company itself

o        The creditor

o        Any Contributory

o        Registrar

O      Any person authorized by central government, in case of oppression or mismanagement (397)

B. WHAT ORDERS, THE COURT MAY PASS? (SEC 443)

The court may pass any one of the following orders on hearing the winding up petition.

 i.     Dismiss it, with or without costs

 ii.    Make any interim order, as it thinks fit, or

 iii.   Pass an order for winding up of the company with or without costs.

Consequences of court passing an order for winding up:

If the court is satisfied, that sufficient reasons exist in the petition for winding up, then it will pass a winding up order. Once the winding up order is passed, following consequences follow:

i.     Court will send notice to an official liquidator, to take change of the company. He shall carry out the process of winding up, ( sec. 444)

ii.    The winding up order, shall be applicable on all the creditors and contributories, whether they have filed the winding up petition or not.

iii.   The official liquidator is appointed by central Government ( sec. 448)

iv.   The company shall relevant particulars, relating to, assets, cash in hand, bank balance, liabilities, particulars of creditors etc, to the official liquidator. ( sec. 454)

v.    The official liquidator shall within six months, from the date of winding up order, submit a preliminary report to the court regarding :

o        Particulars of Capital

o        Cash and negotiable securities

o        Liabilities

o        Movable and immovable properties

o        Unpaid calls, and

o        An opinion, whether further inquiry is required or not ( 455)

The Central Govt. shall keep a cognizance over the functioning of official liquidator, and may require him to answer any inquiry. (463)

C. STAY ORDER:

Where, the court has passed a winding up order, it may stay the proceedings of winding up , on an application filed by official liquidator, or creditor or any contributory. (466)

D. DISSOLUTION OF COMPANY (481)

Finally the court will order for dissolution of the company, when:

o        the affairs of the company are completely wound up, or

o        the official liquidator is unable to carry on the winding up procedure for want of funds.

E. APPEAL: 483

An appeal from the decision of court will lie before that court, before whom, appeals lie from any order or decision of the former court in cases within its ordinary jurisdiction.

B.  VOLUNTARY WINDING UP

A company may, voluntary wind up its affairs, if it is unable to carry on its business, or if it was formed only for a limited purpose, or if it is unable to meet its financial obligation, and etc. A company may voluntary wind up itself, under any of the two modes:

i.     Members voluntarily winding up

ii.    Creditors voluntarily winding up

A company may voluntarily wind up itself, either by passing:

An ordinary resolution, where the purpose for which the company was formed has completed, or the time limit for which the company was formed, has expired.

Or

By way of special resolution

Both types of resolution shall e passed in the general meeting of the company. (484)

Once the resolution of voluntarily winding up is passed, and then the company may be wound up, either through:

O     Members voluntarily winding up, or

o     Creditors voluntarily winding up

The only difference between the abate two, is that in case of members voluntarily winding up, Board of Directors have to make a declaration to the effect, that company has no debts. (488)

 

                   i.            MEMBERS VOLUNTARILY WINDING UP

Directors of the company shall call for a Board of Directors Meeting, and make a declaration  of winding up, accompanied by an Affidavit, stating that;

o        The company has no debts to pay, or

o        The company will repay it's debts; if any, within 3 years from the commencement of winding up, as specified in declaration (488)

WHO SHALL CARRY OUT THE WINDING UP PROCEDURE? & WHAT SHALL BE THE PROCEDURE?

· The Company shall appoint one or more liquidators, in a general meeting, who shall look after the affair of winding up procedure, and distribution of assets. [490 (1)]

· The liquidator so appointed, shall be paid remuneration for his services, which shall also be fixed in general meeting [490 (2)]

 · The Company shall also give notice of appointment of liquidator to the registrar within ten days of appointment (493)

· Once the company has appointed liquidator, the powers of Board of Directors, Managing Director, and Manager, shall cease to exist. (491)

· The liquidator is generally given a free hand, to carry out the winding up procedure, in such a manner, as he thinks best in the interest of creditors, and company.

· In case, the winding up procedure, takes more than one year, then liquidator will have to call a general meeting, at the end of each year, and he shall present, a complete account of the procedure, and position of liquidator (496)

WHEN AFFAIRS OF THE COMPANY ARE FULLY WOUND UP

The liquidator shall take the following steps, when affairs of the company are fully wound up : (497)

i.    Call a general meeting of the members of the company, a lay before it, complete picture of accounts, winding up procedure and how the properties of company are disposed of.

ii.    The meeting shall be called by advertisement, specifying the time, place and object of the meeting.

iii.  The liquidator shall send to, the Registrar and official Liquidator copy of account, within one week of the meeting.

iv.  If from the report, official liquidator comes to the conclusion, that affairs of the company are not being carried in manner prejudicial to the interest of it's members, or public, then the company shall be deemed to be dissolved from the date of report to the court.

v.     However, if official liquidator comes to a finding, that affair have been carried in a manner prejudicial to interest of member or public, then court may direct the liquidator to investigate furthers.

ii. CREDITORS VOLUNTARILY WINDING UP

· Where the resolution for winding up has been passed, but the Board of Directors are not in a position to give a declaration on the liability of company, they may call a meeting of creditors, for the purpose of winding up. (500)

· It is the duty of Board of Directors, to present a full statement of company’s affairs, and list of creditors along with their dues, before the meeting of creditors. [500 (3)]

· Whatever resolution, the company passes in creditor's meeting, shall be given to the Registrar within ten days of its passing. (501)

WHO SHALL CARRY OUT THE WINDING UP PROCEDURE ? & WHAT SHALL BE THE PROCEDURE?

· Company in the general meeting [in which resolution for winding up is passed], and the creditors in their meeting, appoint liquidator. They may either agree on one liquidator, or if two names are suggested, then liquidator appointed by creditor shall act. (502)

· Any director, member or creditor may approach the court, for direction that:

o        Liquidator appointed in general meeting shall act, or

o        He shall act jointly with liquidator appointed by creditor, or

o        Appointing official liquidator, or

o        Some other person to be appointed as liquidator. [502 (2)]

· The remuneration of liquidator shall be fixed by the creditors, or by the court. (504)

· On appointment of liquidator, all the power of Board of Directors shall cease. (505)

· In case, the winding up procedure, takes more than one year, then he will have to call a general meeting, and meeting of creditors, at the end of each year, and he shall present, a complete account of the procedure, and the status / position of liquidation (505).

WHEN AFFAIRS OF THE COMPANY ARE FULLY WOUND UP ( 509)

The liquidator shall take the following steps, when affair of the company are fully wound up:

I.            Call a general meeting, and meeting of creditors, and lay before it, complete picture of accounts, winding up procedure and how the properties of company are disposed of.

II.            The meeting shall be called by advertisement, specifying the time, place and object of the meeting.

 III.            The liquidator shall send to the Registrar and official liquidator copy of account, within one week after the meeting.

 IV.            If from the report, official liquidator comes to the conclusion, that affairs of the company are not being carried in manner prejudicial to the interest of it’s members or public, then the company shall be deemed to be dissolved, from the date of report to the court.

    V.            However, if official liquidator comes to a finding, that affairs have been carried in a manner prejudicial to intent of members or public, and then court may direct the liquidator to investigate further.

DISTRIBUTION OF PROPERTY OF COMPANY ON VOLUNTARILY WINDING UP [BOTH MEMBERS AND CREDITORS VOLUNTARILY WINDING UP]

Once the company is fully wound up, and assets of the company sold or distributed, the proceedings collected are utilized to pay off the liabilities. The proceedings so collected shall be utilized to pay off the creditors in equal proportion. Thereafter any money or property left may be distributed among members according to their rights and interests in the company.

C.  WINDING UP SUBJECT TO SUPERVISION OF COURT.

Winding up subject to supervision of court, is different from "Winding up by court."

Here the court only supervises the winding up procedure. Resolution for winding up is passed by members in the general meeting. It is only for some specific reasons, that court may supervise the winding up proceedings. The court may put up some special terms and conditions also.

However, liberty is granted to creditors, contributories or other to apply to court for some relief. (522)

· The court may also appoint liquidators, in addition to already appointed, or remove any such liquidator. The court may also appoint the official liquidator, as a liquidator to fill up the vacancy.

· Liquidator is entitled to do all such things and acts, as he thinks best in the interest of company. He shall enjoy the same powers, as if the company is being wound-up voluntarily.

· The court also may exercise powers to enforce calls made by the liquidators, and such other powers, as if an order has been made for winding up the company altogether by court. ( 526)

PRIORITY IN DISPOSING LIABILITIES [529 A & 530]

When the company is wound up, by any mode, the liabilities shall be discharged in following priority.

1.     Workman's dues.

2.     Debts due to secured creditors, in case of insolvency.

3.     All ---------, taxes, cesses and rates due from the company to the central government or a state govt.

4.     All wages and salary of any employee due within four months.

5.     All -------- holiday remuneration becoming payable to any employee.

· All such debts shall be paid in full. If assets are insufficient to meet them, they shall abate in equal proportions.

MONEY RECEIVED BY LIQUIDATOR: (553)

Apart from an official liquidator, every liquidator appointed by company or court to carry on the winding up procedure, shall deposit the money is received by him in a scheduled bank, to the credit of a special banking account opened by him.

Apart from a normal company, registered under the companies Act, 1956 there are other companies as well winding up procedure for these companies are bit different from a company registered under companies Act.

These companies are:

1.     UNREGISTERED COMPANIES : (583)

In simple words, an unregistered company is a company which is not registered or covered under provisions of companies Act. 1956 (582)

· An unregistered company cannot be wound up voluntarily, or, subject to super vision of court.

· However, the circumstances, in which unregistered company may be wound up, are as follows:

o         If the company, is dissolved, or has ceased to carry on business, or is carrying on business only for the purposes of winding up, it's affairs,

o         If the company is unable to pay it's debt

o         If the court is of opinion, that it is just and equitable, that the company should be wound up.

· A creditor, contributory, or company itself by filing a petition, or any person authorized by central government may institute winding up proceedings.

· In respect to other aspects, the same provisions and procedure shall follow, as in winding up of registered company.

· A foreign company, carrying on business in India, which has been dissolved, may be wound up, as unregistered company.

1.     FOREIGN COMPANY ( 584)

A foreign company is a company which is incorporated outside India, and having a place of business in India.

Winding up of such companies is only limited to the extent of it's assets in India. In respect of assets and business carried outside India, Indian courts have no jurisdiction.

· Winding up of a foreign company can only be made through court.

· Even if the company had been dissolved or ceased to exist in the country of its incorporation, winding up order in this country can be made.

· Even if a foreign company has been wound up according to foreign law, the courts in India still protect the Indian Creditors. The surplus assets, after paying the creditors, should be distributed among the share holders equally in the same proportion, as the assets ---- to the total issued and paid up capital.

· Pendency of a foreign liquidation does not affect the jurisdiction to make winding up order. The Assets can be of any nature and do not take to be in the ownership of the company and can come from any Source.

· As, for persons claiming to be creditors, their presence, itself is sufficient. It is not required to be shown, that company carried on business operations from any place of business in India.

2.     GOVERNMENT COMPANY

 A Govt. company, means a company, in which 51% or more of, shares are held by a govt. company

Winding up procedure for a government company registered under the companies Act, 1956, is nearly similar to normal winding up procedure.

However, courts, take interest of public into consideration, and priority is given to them, as a govt. company is main function is to provide services to public.

 

 Source http://www.companyliquidator.gov.in/12/windingup_data.htm#b

Companies Act,2013

The new Companies Act (hereinafter referred as CA2013) is replacing old Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred as CA1956). The CA2013 makes comprehensive provisions to govern all listed and unlisted companies in the country. The CA2013 is partially made effective w.e.f. 12^th September, 2013, by way of implementing 98 Sections and repealing the relevant sections corresponded with CA1956. Some of the Salient features of the CA2013 are as under:

1. Democracy of Shareholders: The CA2013 has introduced new concept of class action suits with a view of making shareholders and other stakeholders, more informed and knowledgeable about their rights.
2. Supremacy of Shareholders: The CA2013 focused and provide major aspect on approvals from shareholders on various significant transactions. The Government has rightly reduced the need for the companies to seek approvals to managerial remuneration and the shareholders have been vested with the power to sanction the limit.
3. Strengthening Women Contributions through Board Room:The CA2013 stipulates appointment of at least one woman Director on the Board of the prescribed class of Companies so as to widen the talent pool enabling big Corporates to benefit from diversified backgrounds with different viewpoints.
4. Corporate Social Responsibility: The CA2013 stipulates certain class of Companies to spend a certain amount of money every year on activities/initiatives reflecting Corporate Social Responsibility.  There may be difficulties in implementing in the initial years but this measure would help in improving the Under-privileged & backward sections of Society and the Corporate would in fact gain in terms of their reputation and image in the Society.
5. National Company Law Tribunal: The CA2013 introduced National Company Law Tribunal and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal to replace the Company Law Board and Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction. They would relieve the Courts of their burden while simultaneously providing specialized justice.
6. Fast Track Mergers: The CA2013 proposes a fast track and simplified procedure for mergers and amalgamations of certain class of companies such as holding and subsidiary, and small companies after obtaining approval of the Indian government.
7. Cross Border Mergers:The CA2013 permits cross border mergers, both ways; a foreign company merging with an India Company and vice versa but with prior permission of RBI.
8. Prohibition on forward dealings and insider trading: The CA2013 prohibits directors and key managerial personnel from purchasing call and put options of shares of the company, its holding company and its subsidiary and associate companies as if such person is reasonably expected to have access to price-sensitive information (being information which, if published, is likely to affect the price of the company's securities).  Earlier these provisions were contained in regulations framed by SEBI, as the capital market regulator. Now, it has also been informed that SEBI is expected to discuss changes in certain norms for listed firms so as to make them in line with the rules in the new Act.
9. Increase in number of Shareholders: The CA 2013 increased the number of maximum shareholders in a private company from 50 to 200.
10. Limit on Maximum Partners: The maximum number of persons/partners in any association/partnership may be upto such number as may be prescribed but not exceeding one hundred. This restriction will not apply to an association or partnership, constituted by professionals like lawyer, chartered accountants, company secretaries, etc. who are governed by their special laws. Under the CA1956, there was a limit of maximum 20 persons/partners and there was no exemption granted to the professionals.
11. One Person Company: The CA2013 provides new form of private company, i.e., one person company is introduced that may have only one director and one shareholder. The CA1956 requires minimum two shareholders and two directors in case of a private company.
12. Entrenchment in Articles of Association: The CA2013 provides for entrenchment of articles of association have been introduced.
13. Electronic Mode: The CA2013 proposed E-Governance for various company processes like maintenance and inspection of documents in electronic form, option of keeping of books of accounts in electronic form, financial statements to be placed on company's website, etc.
14. Restriction on Composition: Every company shall have at least one director who has stayed in India for a total period of not less than 182 (one hundred and eighty two) days in the previous calendar year.
15. Independent Directors: The CA2013 provides that all listed companies should have at least one-third of the Board as independent directors. Such other class or classes of public companies as may be prescribed by the Central Government shall also be required to appoint independent directors. No independent director shall hold office for more than two consecutive terms of five years.
16. Serving Notice of Board Meeting: The CA2013 requires at least seven days' notice to call a board meeting. The notice may be sent by electronic means to every director at his address registered with the company. The CA1956 did not prescribe any notice period to call the board meeting of a company.
17. Duties of Director defined: Under the CA1956, a director had fiduciary duties towards a company. However, the CA2013 has NOW defined the duties of a director.
18. Liability on Directors and Officers: The CA2013 does not restrict an Indian company from indemnifying its directors and officers like the CA1956.
19. Rotation of Auditors: The CA2013 provides for rotation of auditors and audit firms in case of publicly traded companies.
20. Auditors performing Non-Audit Services: The CA2013 prohibits Auditors from performing non-audit services to the company where they are auditor to ensure independence and accountability of auditor.  
21. Financial Year: Every company's financial year will be the period ending on 31 March every year.
22. Rehabilitation and Liquidation Process: The entire rehabilitation and liquidation process of the companies in financial crisis has been made time bound under CA2013.

Source: .http://www.mondaq.com/india/x/270182/Corporate+Commercial+Law/Indian+Companies+Act+2013+A+New+Beginning

Formal Contract before starting new business

Starting a new venture is exciting and once an entrepreneur makes some headway, he is so overjoyed at the prospect of doing business for the first time that he often makes one cardinal error - failure to get into a binding contract with his clients. Sure, initial clients usually come from past networking relationships or as referrals. But that's' no reason to skirt formalities.

The absence of a contract can delay payments and lead to even bigger problems, where a bigger client may not pay up at all! There have been instances where small business owners have had to shut shop because they could neither recover payments from clients nor afford an expensive legal battle.

"Failure of clients to pay up on time or not at all is one of the main reasons for the failure of start-ups in India." The threat of legal action often does the trick with errant clients but this needs the backing of a formal contract."

Here are the whys and wherefores of a formal contract.

1. FIRST, DETERMINE THE TERMS

A business contract must clearly spell out details such as the nature of services provided; the benchmark against which work will be evaluated; and, most importantly, the mode, manner and time of payment. There is no place for vague terms such as 'reasonable time frame' or 'subject to satisfaction'. Other critical details are terms of dispute resolution and termination of the contract. Start-ups tend to ignore the latter two terms as they want to turn a blind eye to the possibility of unpleasant developments or are naïve enough to believe that things will not go awry.

2. SEEK LEGAL COUNSEL

While all this sounds simple enough, one needs a thorough grounding in the Indian judicial system to actually draw up a contract. And, no, the Internet is no substitute for hiring legal counsel. Unfortunately, the Indian legal system does not have separate legislation for start-ups and treats all businesses alike. This is why a bigger company with more experience can stamp out a smaller, first-time entrepreneur if there are loopholes in the contract or, worse still, if there is no formal contract at all!

3. SAFEGUARD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

An entrepreneur is unlikely to know about the Indian Contract Act, which must be adhered to while drawing up any contract. Laws pertaining to Intellectual Property (IP) must always be kept in mind, especially if your start-up is in the creative field or any other IP-sensitive business.

4. HIRE AFFORDABLE LEGAL COUNSEL

A formal contract is the very basis of a business agreement. "These documents should be considered the core of the relationship between a start-up and its client, an advisor, employee or investor,". Therefore, it is mandatory to seek legal advice, which should be budgeted for at the planning stage.

So, regardless of how small your business is, make sure you enter into a formal contract before you shake on a deal. At the very least, your professional approach from day one will win you brownie points with angel investors and venture capitalists at a later stage!

Source: Gargi Banerjee, Moneycontrol

Guide to Incorporate Company in India

For setting up a business establishment in India, first step is to incorporate a company whether a private limited or a public limited, which includes:

ü      obtaining director identification number (DIN),

ü      obtaining digital signature certificate,

ü      reserving the company name with the Registrar of Companies (ROC),

ü      paying stamp duties

ü      filing all incorporation forms and documents  and

ü      obtaining the certificate of incorporation.

Thereafter, it is required to get the other necessary formalities done such as:

ü      Company seal

ü      Permanent Account Number (PAN).

Based on the nature of business, it may further be required to obtain a

Tax Account Number (TAN) come taxes deducted at source (TDS).

Subsequently, depending upon the nature of business additional requirements may include

ü      registration for Value Added tax (VAT),

ü      registration with Employees' Provident Fund Organization,

ü      registration for medical insurance (ESIC)

For incorporating a company in India, there is a series of steps required for incorporating a private or public limited company in India. These steps work according to the guidelines provided by The Company’s Act, 1956.

1. The very first step of formation for incorporating a company is to get the name of the company registered at the Registered of Companies (ROC) in the territory of the company’s registered office. The company’s name should not match any existing name. ROC at least takes a week from the date of registration of the name to assure that the name does not exist before.

2. After the completion of this process, the company has to file a Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association with ROC itself. For a public company, the company’s name should end up with “Limited” and for a private company; the company’s name should end up with “Private Ltd”.

3. After submitting the Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association, ROC issues an incorporated certificate only after receiving a mandatory registration fees.

4. After these steps, the next main step is to get the address of the registered office. It is not mandatory for the registered office to be the same building from where all the work is being carried out.

5. Foreign companies need to fill up a FNV-5 form with the Reserve Bank of India to get the permission to start the manufacturing and trading activities in India without an Indian partner. Any Indian or foreigner can be the director of a company in India. Any person whether he/she is Indian or foreigner and any Indian company or foreign company can be shareholder of an Indian company.

6. For incorporating a Public Company, a minimum of three directors and seven shareholders are required and for incorporating Private Company, a minimum of two directors and two shareholders are required.

7. After the registration and certification, each company needs to designate an Auditor. He has a very important duty to perform in the company. All the balance sheets, company’s documents and company’s meetings are scrutinized by him.

8. Every company should have an account book and written records of all the directors, shareholders and the employees. Account book takes care of all income, including profits and losses and the records register takes care of all the past and present work of the people associated with the company.

9. At last, each company should have a different logo, and a stamp of that logo which is imprinted on each written record and each written document of the company. 

Agarwal and Company Law Offices LLP.

Increase in Trademarks Infringement Cases

Under the Trademarks Act, 1999, the Registered Proprietor or the authorized user of a trademark can take recourse to civil or criminal action against the infringer in the appropriate fora. The statistics of trademark infringements is not maintained by the Central Government.

 

The accession (proposed notification of Trademark rules under the Trademark (Amendment) Act, 2010 would enable the Indian companies to register their trademarks in the member-countries of the Protocol through a single applications as well as allow foreign companies to register their trade marks in India, within a specific timeframe i.e. 18 months. At present, there are 86 contracting parties to the Protocol. Under the Trademarks (Amendments) Act, 2010, the Head Office of the Trade Marks Registry (which is at Mumbai) or such branch of the Trade Marks Registry as the Central Government may by notification in the Official Gazette specify, will deal with the international applications.

Limitation Act - Time for Appeal

Law relating to limitation is incorporated in the Limitation Act 1963 which prescribes different periods of limitation for suits, petition or applications. The act applies to all civil proceedings and some special criminal proceedings which can be taken in the court of law unless its application is excluded by any enactment. The Act extends to whole of India except the state of Jammu and Kashmir. The statutes of limitation are based on the principles of public policy which diligence and to prevent oppression.

 

The Law of limitation bars the remedy in a court of law only when the period of limitation has expired, but it does not extinguish the right that it cannot be enforced by judicial process. Thus if a claim is satisfied outside the court of law after the expiry of period of limitation, that is not illegal.

 

The intention of the law of limitation is, not to give right where there is not one, but to interpose a bar after a certain period to a suit to enforce an existing right. The object is to compel litigants to be diligent in seeking remedies in court of law by prohibiting stale claims. It is to help the bona fide claimant and to prevent fraud being practiced by people upon innocent persons by keeping action hanging on them for a long time.

 

Computation of the period of Limitation

 

The Courts in India are bound by the specific provisions of the limitation Act and are not permitted to move outside the ambit of these provisions. The Act prescribed the period of limitation in Articles in schedule to the Act. In the articles of the schedule to the limitation Act. columns 1,2, and 3 must read together to give harmonious meaning and construction.

 

Bar of Limitation

 

Sec 3 of the Act provides that any suit, appeal or application if made beyond the prescribed period of limitation, it is the duty of the court not to proceed with such suits irrespective of the fact whether the plea of limitation has been setup in defence or not. The provision of sec 3 are mandatory. The court can suo  motu take note. The effect of sec 3 not to deprive the court of is jurisdiction. Therefore, decision of a court allowing a suit which had been instituted after the period prescribed is not vitiated for want of jurisdiction.

 

Extension of Time in Certain Cases

 

Doctrine of sufficient cause

 

Sec 5 allows the extension of prescribed period in certain cases on sufficient cause being shown for the delay. This is known as doctrine of “Sufficient cause” for condonation of delay which is embodied in sec 5 of the Limitation Act. 1963. Sec 5 provides that any application other than application under provision of order XXI of the code of civil procedure 1908 may admitted after the period of limitation if the appellant satisfies the court that he had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal. However it must be a cause which is beyond the control of the party.

 

Person under legal disability

 

Section 6 is an enabling section to enable persons under disability to exercise their legal rights within a certain time. Section 7 supplements section 6,section 8 controls these section, which served as an exception  to sec 6 and 7. The combined effect of section 6 and 8 is that where the prescribed limit expires before the cessation of disability, for instance, before the attainment of majority, the minor will no doubt be entitled fresh period of limitation.

 

Computation of period of limitation:

i)  Section 12 to 24 deals with computation of period limitation. As per section 12 the day to be excluded in computing period is the day from which the period is to be reckoned and the time requisite for obtaining a copy of decree shall be excluded.

ii)  Time which leave to sue or appeal as a pauper is applied for also excluded.

iii)  The time which a suit or application stayed by an injunction and the continuance of the injunction and the time taken for obtaining sanction or consent.

Divorce by mutual consent

i) A separation of one year before filing the case please note that actual physical separation is not required, even if both parties are sleeping in the same bedroom they can be said to be seperated for the purposes of mutual consent, if they are not living together as husband and wife;

 

ii) A flawlessly drafted MoU (Memorandum of Understanding) that settles the terms on which you part away, people don’t understand the importance of this, this is extremely important so as to end the matters with a finality once and for all, there are no loose ends and make sure there is no litigation in future;

 

Once the above is done – you have to get drafted the Divorce petition that encapsulates the contents of your earlier MoU.

 

After Court

 

When you file your divorce by mutual consent petition – it comes up for hearing and your statements are recorded, then the court gives you a period of 6 months (basically to think over your decision) after which,  on recording of final statements divorce decree is passed.

 

Monetary Settlement/Maintenance/Alimony/Child Custody issues.

 

A Mutual Consent petition gives you the flexibility to come to your own terms with respect to the issue. If a full and final settlement is reached – the money can be paid before the court at the time of final hearing.

 

In all this procedure enables couples to part away amicably on a good note, without ruinous litigation, and without much expense.

Points to remember before purchasing a Re-Sale property

A resale property:

Who does not wish to live in a house of their own? Buying a new flat will take a long time, so some of us may wish to settle for buying a resale property.  However buying a resale property could involve many legal and other procedural requirements. It is prudent to first understand the various procedures and safety measures for buying resale property to avoid hassles in future. 

Buying Resale Property –A Guide

Consult Experts:

It may be ideal to engage a good real estate agent to locate a resale property. He would be in a position to locate sellers as well as guide you regarding the price of such properties in different localities. They would also be in a position to tell you about the seller of the property. Most real estate agents charge a fee and also help with registration, payment of stamp duty and other paper work involved in the purchase of resale property. In addition, taking the help of a good lawyer would also help to make sure that things are clear legally also.

Title of the property:

It will help engaging experts like real estate agents and lawyers to help you, but it is always better to be well-informed yourself when entering into deals for buying resale property. The first step in this regard would be to establish the title of the seller; whether he is the real owner of the property or has been given the power of attorney to transact the deal. All the documents with regard to the property need to be clear. In addition you need to make sure that all the original documents with regard to the property that were given by the builder or original developer are in order.

Documents:

Buying resale property seems great, but it could become a big problem if the documents regarding the original purchase and subsequent transfer of title are not properly stamped. Firstly it could pose great problems especially if you want to apply for a loan for purchase of the resale property. Subsequently it could prove to be unacceptable in case you wish to transact further on the property.

Existing Loan:

It is also necessary to make sure that the property documents are not lying mortgaged in the bank’s custody against a loan taken by the seller. The bank will consider a loan only once the loan taken by the seller is repaid and the documents released.  

Loan Eligibility:

Buying a resale property would definitely provide you with a bigger space in case of older properties. However it is best to note that some banks may not lend money on buildings older than 10 years. This may be due to the reason that they may not want to take the risk of the price of the property going down. Banks also make sure to ensure that the bank’s outstanding loan should always be lower than the value of the property in the market.

Property Valuation:

Next it is imperative to note that the loan amount is highly dependent on the cost of the property. Technical experts would evaluate the property. However it would be useful to yourself avail the services of a property valuer at a small fee before approaching the banks. The bank’s property valuer may valuate the property at a much lower rate. They would also like to safeguard their interests against the fall in the price of the property in future.

More Down Payment:

Most banks wish to make sure that you be responsible for the maintenance and good upkeep of the resale property. So banks would expect you as the purchaser of the resale property to pay a certain percentage of the price as down payment. You may have to pay about 20% of the price as down payment; property of 50 lakhs requires 10 lakh as down payment.

Age of the property:

This down payment could be more in case of older properties. In addition, banks usually lend only on properties that are unto 50 years old. The tenure of the loan also decreases with the age of the property.

Flat Society:

The bank may grant the loan and you may make the down payment, but there could be another problem. It arises out of the need for some Flat societies that require the payment of a heavy price for change of ownership. It is best to consider this cost also when coming to a conclusion while purchasing resale property in cooperative and other societies.

Conclusion:

Buying resale property would give you a chance to settle in your own house fast and save you of high rents paid and the need to frequently shift your place of living. Taking a loan from the bank could give you tax deductions on the interest paid soon. You would not have to wait till the possession as in the case of new flats. It is always prudent to be well   informed about the various details of the resale property. 

http://www.agarwalandco.com/

Delhi HC judgment in Lt Foods Ltd v. Sunstar Overseas Ltd &Anr.

The Delhi HC, in Lt Foods Ltd v. Sunstar Overseas Ltd &Anr., decided on a bunch of interim applications filed by the parties in the cross-suits, seeking injunction against each other. The parties, in the instant case, claimed ownership rights over the mark “HERITAGE” used in respect of rice. While plaintiff claimed to be the user of the mark since 1997, the defendant claimed to be the user from 1985.The parties did not dispute that the marks used by them viz., “HERITAGE” by plaintiff (Registration no. 799246) and “INDIAN HERITAGE” & “INDIAN HERITAGE SELECT” (Registration no. 1149872) by defendants were deceptively similar.

Background

The plaintiff, in March 2009, came to know that the defendant exported rice under the mark “INDIAN HERITAGE”. The plaintiff, along with an interim application, filed the first suit (CS (OS) No. 612/2009) for permanent injunction restraining the infringement of trademark, passing off, rendition of accounts of profits/damages etc. against the defendants. The defendants filed a separate suit against the plaintiff (CS (OS) No. 639/2009) for permanent injunction restraining the infringement of trademark, passing off, rendition of profits etc. The plaintiff filed its second suit (CS(OS) No. 653/2009) wherein it made additional statements based on subsequent events. The plaintiff, in the aforesaid suit, argued that the invoices adduced by the defendant were dubious and fabricated and did not establish any substantial, continuous and genuine commercial use of the mark “INDIAN HERITAGE SELECT”. The instant judgment, discussed in this post, decided upon a bunch of interim applications filed by the parties in the above mentioned cross-suits, seeking injunctions against each other.

Judgment

Considering Section 28(3) of Trade Marks Act, 1999, the Court held that the suits filed by them against each other for infringement of trademark were not maintainable. [ Section 28(3): Where two or more persons are registered proprietors of trademarks, which are identical with or nearly resemble each other, the exclusive right to the use of any of those trademarks shall not (except so far as their respective rights are subject to any conditions or limitations entered on the register) be deemed to have been acquired by any one of those persons as against any other of those persons merely by registration of the trademarks but each of those persons has otherwise the same rights as against other persons (not being registered users using by way of permitted use) as he would have if he were the sole registered proprietor.] However, suit for passing off was held to be maintainable.

The Court, in this context, examined the evidence adduced by parties for determining the prior user of the mark in question. The Court appointed Local Commissioners to verify the copies of invoices presented before the Court by the plaintiff and the defendant. On perusing the evidence produced by the plaintiff (application for registration dated 20.04.1998 in class 30, statement of total annual sales during the period 1998 – 2009 & invoices during the period 1998 – 2009), the Court prima facie determined that the plaintiff was using the mark continuously since 1998.

The Court, however, dismissed the documents filed by defendants as “not genuine”. Considering the report of Local Commissioner which stated that the defendant did not use the mark “HERITAGE” in any of the exports as evidenced by the shipping bills and supporting documents made available by the customs department, it was held that the defendants argued their case based on documents which were prima facie forged and fabricated. The report of the Local Commissioner noted that the defendants interpolated the mark “HERITAGE SELECT”by replacing the words “SUPER” or “KITCHEN KING” marks in the invoices produced before the Court.

The judgment noted that there was not any clear and cogent evidence available on record to show use of mark prior to 11.11.2002 (date of application filed by defendant) by the defendant. It was noted that the defendant did not furnish sales figures for any financial year. It was also noted that the defendants did not produce and furnish the originals in spite of being given ample opportunities. The Court applied the principle of adverse presumption viz., the Court can draw an adverse presumption against the party if the party withholds a document or evidence knowing that the said document will operate to his disadvantage and held that Court would not assist a party whose case was founded on falsehood. The Court accordingly dismissed the interim applications filed by the defendant. The defendants, their licensees and franchisees were restrained from selling, exporting or dealing in rice under the impugned marks “INDIAN HERITAGE SELECT”/ “HERITAGE SELECT” or any other mark which might be deceptively similar to the mark “HERITAGE” of the plaintiff till the disposal of the suit. Further, the defendant was asked to deposit INR 50,000 with the Prime Minister’s Relief Fund for wasting the time of the Court.

Analysis

The conduct of defendant prima facie did give an impression that the case was built on forged and fabricated documents. It will be highly unfortunate (both legally and ethically) if it is conclusively determined in the final judgment. Further, the judgment is a warning to those who fail to adduce originals as and when they are required to be produced before the Court- especially in a suit for passing off as it is imperative to produce clear and cogent evidence in such a suit. Passing off protects a mark only if goodwill and reputation are effectively demonstrated. The burden is upon the aggrieved to gather survey evidence for demonstrating the possibility or existence of confusion.

The judgment also highlighted the law of adverse presumption by referring to the Supreme Court judgment in Pradip Buragohain v. Pranati Phukan (2010 (11) SCC 108): “We may in this regard refer to illustration (g) to Section 114 of the Evidence Act which permits the Court to draw an adverse presumption against the party in default to the effect that evidence which could be but is not produced would, if produced, have been unfavourable to the person who withholds it. The rule is contained in the well-known maxim: omniapraesumuntur contra spoliatorem. If a man wrongfully withholds evidence, every presumption to his disadvantage consistent with the facts admitted or proved will be adopted.”

.

.

.

http://www.agarwalandco.com

.

.

.

.

.

.

Source: http://spicyipindia.blogspot.in/2012/06/note-on-delhi-hc-judgment-in-lt-foods.html

Passing Off Action by Mid-Size Foreign Companies Having Unregistered Marks in India

There are often cases that we undertake for representation, wherein the cases relate to enforcement of trademarks by/of mid-sized foreign corporations that have not been filed and/or used in India against Indian companies that have deceptively used their marks thereby constituting misrepresentation, which might amount to passing off. Rupkatha and Poorva, interns at Khurana & Khurana, look at some of these cases and try to identify certain parameters based on which the mid-sized foreign companies can protect their interest.

Perry v. Truefitt[1], the English case where the tort of passing off was first articulated had clearly pointed out that “a man is not to sell his own goods under the pretence that they are the goods of another trader.” The House of Lords further laid down the essential elements of passing off in Reckitt & Colman Ltd v Borden Inc [2] as:

• The existence of claimant’s goodwill
• Misrepresentation
• Damage or likely damage

Section 27(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 authorizes any trader to institute passing off action against another in spite of the fact that his mark is unregistered. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has laid down three elements that need to be fulfilled in order to institute a passing off action by the plaintiff in Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd.[3]:

• The defendant must have sold its goods or offered its services in a manner which has deceived or would be likely to deceive the public into thinking that the defendant’s goods or services are the plaintiffs.
• The likelihood of confusion in the minds of the public that the goods or services offered by the defendant are the goods or the services of the plaintiff.
• The likelihood of confusion in the minds of the public that the goods or services offered by the defendant are the goods or the services of the plaintiff.

Unregistered Marks of Foreign Companies

Section 18 of the Act allows foreign nationals to register their mark in India. Once a mark is registered, the company can take action for infringement against any person who tries to do so. The problem arises when the mark is unregistered. Is there any remedy for the company in such a situation? Or will it remain at the receiving end?

The Indian judiciary has played its role of filling up the gap in the law in such situations. Time and again it has granted relief to foreign companies who are yet to register their marks in India even though the defendant had registered its mark. In N.R Dongre v. Whirlpool Corporation[4], injunction was granted in favour of Whirlpool Corporation based on the fact that although their mark was not renewed, they had gained enough goodwill and reputation in the Indian market which was being wrongly used by the defendant.

The general trend has been to grant relief only to multinational corporations who have a good market in India or who are big names in the international arena. The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in Centrol Industrial Alliance Ltd. versus Gillette U.K. Ltd.[5], the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in Jolen Inc. vs Doctor & Company[6] and Indian Shaving Products Ltd. v. Gift Pack[7] and several other High Courts have held that in order to get injunction in favour of a foreign company with an un-registered trademark, goodwill in the Indian market is an essential pre-requisite.

The problem then arises with the mid-sized companies. There are about 40 marks in the latest trademark journal published by the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademark which are deceptively similar or rather have been ‘copied’ from the trademark of some foreign company, big or small. Till now, the trend has been to provide no relief to companies having without any trans-border reputation. The Intellectual Property Appellate Board rejected the opposition posed by the appellant in Kraft Jacobs Sucharc Ltd. v. Government of India by Secretary[8] on the ground that the opponent did not have any presence in the Indian market and did not intend to come to do business here in the near future.

The road ahead

The Court has definitely observed in the Jolen Inc. case[9] “even if it is assumed that such advertisements or marks do not travel beyond the borders of the countries where the plaintiff has the business, still it has a right to protect its reputation and goodwill. It is more so where the trade name has been pirated in totality and not by way of having deceptive or confusing similarity.” The Supreme Court in Milment Oftho Industries & Ors. v. Allergan Inc.[10] held that non-use in India would be irrelevant if the plaintiff was the first in the world market. However, the decision carried a word of caution that foreign brand owners who have no intention of coming to or introducing their product in India will not be allowed to stifle an Indian company by not permitting it to sell a product in India, if the Indian company has genuinely adopted the mark.

Therefore, if it can be shown that the defendant had adopted the complete mark knowing very well that another company of some other country has already adopted that mark, then mala fide on part of the Indian company can be argued.

Now, the Indian courts have been conservative in their approach and constantly relied upon the circulation of magazines, journals and extent of Indian travellers going abroad while deciding these types of cases. This approach is outdated in the light of modern means of exchanging information. The internet, for example, provides a global forum for any product manufactured in one country. Thus, when an Indian company launches a website bearing the trademark of some foreign company, it becomes easier to hold it liable. The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) manages the top-level development and architecture of the internet domain name space. It authorizes domain name registrars through which domain names can be registered and re-assigned. Thus, any person who seeks to register a domain name is informed about the availability of that domain name. Rule 2 of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy[11] requires an applicant to determine that the domain name for which registration is sought does not infringe or violate another’s rights. Thus, if the proposed domain name violates another person’s trademark rights, it will violate Rule 2 of the policy. In such eventuality, the registrar can refuse to register the domain name. Thus, a domain name that is properly registered under international requirements is still subject to the Trademarks Act if a rights owner successfully proves that it has rights flowing from the act.

It was held in the celebrated UK case of Marks and Spencer’s v. One in a Million[12] that any person who deliberately registers a domain name on account of its similarity to the name, brand name or trademark of an unconnected commercial organization must expect to find himself on the receiving end of an injunction to restrain the threat of passing off. This was reiterated by the Delhi High Court in Yahoo!, Inc. v. Akash Arora[13]. After the celebrated case of Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd.[14], there is no doubt that internet domain names are subject to the legal norms applicable to trademarks.

Conclusion

A person who has directly copied the trademark of a foreign company having a proper accessible website and trading in the same goods and services, cannot take the plea that he was not aware of his opponent’s presence in the market. Further, it is strongly recommended that the plight of the mid-sized companies be addressed soon and internet as an advertising and communicating forum gets acknowledged. After all, this is a wrong committed by the Indian company and thus a remedy must be sort out.

---

[1] (1842) 6 Beav. 66

[2] [1990] 1 All E.R. 873

[3] 2004(6) SCC 145

[4] 1996(5) SCC 714

[5] 1998 PTC (18) (DB)

[6] 2002 (25) PTC 29 (Del.)

[7] [1998] PTC 698 (Del)

[8] 2004 (29) PTC 376 IPAB

[9] Supra n6

[10] 2004 (28) PTC 585 (SC)

[11] It is a process established by ICANN for the resolution of disputes regarding the registration of internet domain names. It currently applies to all .aero, .asia, .biz, .cat, .com, .coop, .info, .jobs, .mobi, .museum, .name, .net,.org, .pro, .tel and .travel top-level domains,and some country code top-level domains. Refer to http://www.icann.org/en/help/dndr/udrp

[12] 1998 FSR 265

[13] 78 (1999) DLT 285

[14] AIR 2004 SC 3540

 www.agarwalandco.com

Source: http://iiprd.wordpress.com/2012/06/02/passing-off-action-by-mid-size-foreign-companies-having-unregistered-marks-in-india/