SC-The Hon’ble SC did not find any good ground to refer the judgment of this Court in Satyawati Sharma (Dead) by LRs. Vs. UOI for reconsideration by a larger Bench. It observed that the case of Satyawati Sharma which held that sec. 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act,1958 is violative of the doctrine of equality embodied in Article 14 of the Constitution insofar as it discriminates between the premises let for residential and non-residential purposes when the same are required bona fide by the landlord for occupation for himself or for any member of his family dependent on him and restricts the latter's right to seek eviction of the tenant from the premises let for residential purposes only, cannot be held to be per incuriam.-Hon'ble Justices Ashok Bhushan and K.M. Joseph[05-08-2019]
Read the full judgment with iDRAF (Issue,Decision,Reasoning,Arguments,Facts)-https://www.legitquest.com/vinod-kumar-vs-ashok-kumar-gandhi
Agarwal and Company - Advocates agarwalandco@gmail.com; info@saketadvocate.com; 011-79619811; 9810176867
Tuesday, August 20, 2019
VINOD KUMAR V. ASHOK KUMAR GANDHI
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment